Caroline is Writing

a blog by a writer attempting to live the literary good life on the internet
4 min read Permalink

One Of My Most Toxic Traits

Thirteen things this Thursday that I have read, watched, listened to or otherwise found noteworthy.

Dear friends,

Welcome to everyone who has signed up since I posted my emo little video on Instagram. In this format, you find me relaxed and happy to be in touch with you directly, with no algorithms or corporate overlords between us. If you do ever want to talk to me, you can just reply to this email — I had some excellent conversations about American attitudes to potatoes after sharing this map last time. Last week's most popular link was, inevitably, the one where you can test your perception of the colour blue.

What I've been up to: you can hear me talking about health anxiety and the Chalet School books on this new episode of the Tophole! podcast.

Here are thirteen more things this Thursday that I wanted to share with you:

  1. An oldie but a goodie. It's been fifteen years, but this piece of writing never fails to raise a smile for me at this time of year: It’s Decorative Gourd Season, Motherfuckers.
  2. One of several life-altering revelations I came to during the process of writing A Body Made of Glass is that an awful lot of the daily mental grind of "feeling well" or otherwise is actually just to do with the state of our digestion. If I may quote myself for a preposterous second, I put this better in the book: "We are essentially tubes into which we put food to be processed every day; the limbs are just how we move the tubes around the world." Therefore, I was intrigued to learn of a new(ish) book, Rumbles: A Curious History of the Gut* by Elsa Richardson, that explores just this connection between the human stomach and the human condition. This interview with the author gives a good overview of what the book covers, from George Cheyne's "English malady" to modern wellness nonsense.
  3. Billie Eilish can sing jazz? I wish she would do it more:
  1. I love this project: mygranddadiskeepingbusy.com. The grandad of the title died in 1983, having kept a diary for the previous twenty years. His granddaughter has now transcribed and scheduled the posts, so that each day the site updates with his corresponding entry. They mostly tell of a life spent in contented yet active retirement, full of gardening, friends, chores, and the occasional mention of his rheumatoid arthritis. This entry, from 1st September 1963, is delightfully typical: "A bit cloudy at first but lovely later. Cleaned the weeds from round gooseberry trees. Ron, Dot and Jane came. Took Jane for a little walk. Mrs Starkey had a daughter Thursday."
  2. This account of a reunion for the surviving members of the boys' choir that sang on a recording of Benjamin Britten's War Requiem in 1963 is very sweet. Bonus fact for choir nerds: one of the choristers was John Rutter!
  3. Forget Wordle, this is the new daily game to play. Scrambled Maps presents you with a new map every day, broken into 18 tiles, and you must reassemble it using the clues from roads, rivers, railways and so on. Pleasantly addictive.
I unscrambled Kraków!
  1. As someone who is exceptionally picky about how audiobooks sound, I was cheering at every line of this piece: Can We Please Put an End to Overperformed Audiobooks?
  2. A glorious list of things that don't sound like they are named after people, but actually are. For example: Brown noise (named for a Robert Brown), shrapnel (Henry Shrapnel) and Max Factor (founded by Maksymilian Faktorowicz, who went by Max Factor in the US).
  3. A beautiful poem about life and work, "Emergency Exit" by Kayla Czaga. Some favourite lines:
"I ordered too many cases of house wine.
I helped Rhea retire. I wore a headset backstage
and whispered to the Ukrainian dancing girls
that they were up next on the telethon.
For all these jobs, I made money. Enough to live on,
amounts that always felt like too much or too little
compensation for the tasks I’d performed."
  1. One of my most toxic traits is that I always know which way north is and I find it inexplicable that everyone else doesn't too. What do you mean, you don't have an ever-present map in your head that is rotating and updating as you move through the world?? This report on navigational games and the notion of a "sense of a direction" was a good corrective for me.
  2. A documentary, narrated by Brendan Gleeson, about the National History Museum in Dublin (or as it is better known "The Dead Zoo") and how the curators managed to get two 150-year-old whale skeletons down from the ceiling without breaking them:
  1. I love the blog "McMansion Hell" and all of the architectural insanity that it documents. This might be its best post to date. It begins: "It is my pleasure to bring you the greatest house I have ever seen. The house of a true visionary. A real ad-hocist. A genuine pioneer of fenestration. This house is in Alabama. It was built in 1980 and costs around $5 million. It is worth every penny. Perhaps more."
  2. A collection of books that are begging to be judged by their covers.

I intend to send out a few different types of post on this newsletter as it becomes more active: personal essays, reading updates and book reviews, reflections on my own writing, and links round-ups like this one. If you would like to receive some but not all of these, you can adjust those settings in your account menu. I don't publish these posts on my website; this is a newsletter-only publication, so you will need to be subscribed to receive it.

I'm writing this in my free time, but if you would like to support my work, you have a few options. Forward this newsletter to a friend and encourage them to sign up. Subscribe to my podcast, Shedunnit, in your app of choice, or if you are already a listener, become a member of the Shedunnit Book Club. Buy my books — The Way to the Sea and A Body Made of Glass — or borrow them from your local library. Purchase a subscription for yourself or a friend to The Browser. Thank you for reading.

Until next time,

Caroline

Links marked thus* are affiliate links for Blackwell's, meaning that I receive a small commission when you purchase a book there (the price remains the same for you). Blackwell’s is a UK bookselling chain that ships internationally at no extra charge.

Filed under: Thursday Thirteen, Blog
4 min read Permalink

The Months-Long Kafkaesque Ordeal

Thirteen things this Thursday that I have read, watched, listened to or otherwise found noteworthy.

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for the kind responses to last week's links newsletter. If you do ever want to talk to me, you can just reply to this email.

Here are thirteen more things this Thursday that I wanted to share with you:

  1. From this podcast, The Female Bob Dylan, I learned more about Connie Converse — a highly talented singer-songerwriter who began performing in the 1950s but then cut all ties and disappeared in August 1974 never to be seen again. Her family respected her wishes that they not look for her. "Let me go, let me be if I can, let me not be if I can't," she wrote in her farewell letters to loved ones. In 2009, an album of her home recordings, How Sad, How Lovely, was released. I love it: it reminds me of early 1970s music by Vashti Bunyan and Lal & Mike Waterson.
  2. These portraits of people taken on a 400km walk around London are very arresting.
  3. We recently started watching The Project, Peter Kosminsky's 2002 BBC drama that follows the fortunes of three young left-wing activists from Labour's 1992 election defeat through to Blair's re-election in 2001. So much to enjoy here, from the 1990s tech nostalgia (they do some dirty tricks journalism at conference involving pagers and fax machines!) to the appearance of not one but two actors who have played iconic roles in Pride & Prejudice adaptations (Crispin Bonham-Carter, Mr Bingley, 1995 and Matthew Macfadyen, Mr Darcy, 2005).
  4. Is My Blue Your Blue? A tool for testing your perception of colour against everyone else's. Turns out, my blue is greener than 57 per cent of the sample population. Turquoise is blue, though, and that is a hill I am prepared to die on.
  5. I was delighted to see Sam Leith write about the absolute horror show that is trying to clear copyright permissions to include quotations in a book. This is an under-discussed aspect of authorship, I believe. I don't think many readers know about the agony involved in including even six words of an in-copyright poem in a new book. Not only must you track down the rights holder in all relevant territories, but you, not the publisher, then have to pay whatever they demand (and if the estate is represented by a rapacious agency, it could be hundreds of pounds per word). The threshold for permission is not clear and the law is ill-defined. This has a chilling effect on publishers; they will always urge you to pay up for even the tiniest quotation to avoid litigation. I'm still recovering from the months-long Kafkaesque ordeal of trying to discover who I should pay for the Philippines audio rights to quote from Andrew Motion's biography of Philip Larkin. I hope anyone who has listened to A Body Made of Glass there appreciates the effort involved.
  6. I love an obscure and highly specific book, and luckily archive.org is full of them. The Heraldry of Fish by Thomas Moule from 1842 scratches this itch perfectly. Sadly, it's not about fish with their own coats of arms, but rather the way the nobility incorporated fish into their symbology.
  7. A perfect comic song about why we buy bath gift sets at Christmas for people we barely know.
  8. Maps of where different crops grow in the US. My main takeaway: I'm shocked by how few places are doing potatoes compared to soybeans.
  9. I found this essay by Thea Lim about self-worth, work and what the algorithms are doing to our ability to make anything free of the relentless capture of internet platforms mildly devastating. As an author/podcaster who is under pressure to beg people to read/listen to my stuff online all day, I feel very raw on this subject, but as Lim points out, even those who work in relatively "offline" fields or actively reject this stuff are still inside the matrix.
"And those ascetics who disavow all socials? They are still caught in the network. Acts of pure leisure—photographing a sidewalk cat with a camera app or watching a video on how to make a curry—are transmuted into data to grade how well the app or the creators’ deliverables are delivering. If we’re not being tallied, we affect the tally of others. We are all data workers.
  1. Software engineer Teresa Ibarra did an interesting analysis of the ~80,000 text messages she exchanged with her then boyfriend in 2015/6. You can see the development of their pet names for each other, how much they mentioned the word "love", and what their major stressors were.
  2. A pencil is an instrument of optimism because 95 per cent of it is designed for writing, and only five per cent for erasing.
  3. Archery is a thriving pastime in the Indian state of Meghalaya because the Shillong Daily Teer lottery is the only form of legal gambling. Betters guess how many arrows will be shot in the daily competition, much like picking numbers for any other lottery.
  4. A handy list of ambiguous words, ranked by how many meanings they have. "Break" tops the list, with 75 definitions.

I intend to send out a few different types of post on this newsletter as it becomes more active: personal essays, reading updates and book reviews, reflections on my own writing, and links round-ups like this one. If you would like to receive some but not all of these, you can adjust those settings in your account menu. I don't publish these posts on my website; this is a newsletter-only publication, so you will need to be subscribed to receive it.

I'm writing this in my free time, but if you would like to support my work, you have a few options. Forward this newsletter to a friend and encourage them to sign up. Subscribe to my podcast, Shedunnit, in your app of choice, or if you are already a listener, become a member of the Shedunnit Book Club. Buy my books — The Way to the Sea and A Body Made of Glass — or borrow them from your local library. Purchase a subscription for yourself or a friend to The Browser. Thank you for reading.

Until next time,

Caroline

Filed under: Thursday Thirteen, Blog
5 min read Permalink

I Do Not Think It Very Nice

Thirteen things this Thursday that I have read, watched, listened to or otherwise found noteworthy.

Dear friends,

The urge to newsletter has hit me again. Perhaps it is the arrival of September, which always makes me itchy with the desire to start new projects, or maybe I am just inventing reasons not to be working on my new book proposal. Either way, here I am, in your inbox once more, with a baker's dozen of recommendations. I'm also doing my last (for now) in person book event for A Body Made of Glass at the Liverpool Literary Festival on Saturday 5th October — do come if you are able. Now, links:

  • Why, thirty years in, are we still holding that there is necessarily a qualitative difference between "writing" and "writing on the internet"? There is good and bad in both categories. This thoughtful essay should carry a dedication to everyone who has ever been told by a commissioning editor that their idea "sounds like more of a blog than an article..."
  • A Spark of Darkness, a two-part Hitchcock-inspired radio drama about a naval electrician turned detective investigating his apprentice's supposedly accidental death, is magnificently good. It is written by David K. Barnes and directed/sound designed by Andy Goddard, both of whom previously worked on the best fiction podcast to come out of the 2010s, Wooden Overcoats.
  • The Brazilian city of Linhares has recognised the legal rights of the waves at the mouth of the Doce River that enters the South Atlantic Ocean at the coast there. A bill stating that "waves have the right to continue breaking perfectly at the mouth of the Doce River" has been made into law — a response to a 2015 environmental disaster when a dam collapsed and ten million gallons of sludge from an iron mine entered the stream. The "legal personhood for natural phenomena" movement is gaining traction around the world and I find it philosophically fascinating. I'm looking forward to Robert Macfarlane's upcoming book, Is A River Alive?* for this reason.
  • When Virginia and Leonard Woolf's flat at 52 Tavistock Square, Bloomsbury was bombed in October 1940, they and their portable possessions had already moved out to another property. But the murals and decorative panels created by Vanessa Bell and Duncan Grant were still on the walls, as you can see in these photographs.
  • Spell your name with aerial photographs of the Earth: this generator allows you to type in some letters and it will then search NASA's "Landsat" image database for features that match the shapes. On the website, you can then hover over each separate image and it will tell you what and where it is. Here's my first name, made up of images of Antarctica, Kentucky, Utah, Oregon, Indonesia, New York, Bolivia and Tibet:
I own the scheme is very neat,
I do not think it very nice
That we should own the blooming street
With all the people poor as mice.
I have old views: that loaded dice
Are “wrong”, and even Tit-for-tat
“Heathen”, that virtue is not vice —
And lots of little things like that.
  • I very much enjoyed Ed Pratt's series of daily short videos about travelling from the source of the Thames to the sea without leaving the river. Here's his first instalment, in which he wades along in the ankle deep marsh that passes for a stream near Kemble in the Cotswolds. Readers of my first book, The Way to the Sea, will remember that I did a bit of this wading myself at the start of the first chapter. Don't worry, though, he gets in a kayak once he reaches Cricklade.
  • This 2012 BBC documentary Sex and Sensibility: The Allure of Art Nouveau joined a lot of dots in my personal (sparse) knowledge of art history. I now know, for instance, what connects the work of Margaret Macdonald Mackintosh and Gustav Klimt. And there's also some lovely footage of Charles Rennie Mackintosh's Glasgow School of Art, which was largely destroyed by two fires in 2014 and 2018 and still remains a membrane-wrapped ruin stuck in insurance claim limbo.
    • From that documentary, I learned of the existence of Klimt's Beethovenfries, a room-sized artwork from 1902. It was painted to celebrate the 75th anniversary of the composer's death. The work was apparently inspired by Wagner’s transcription of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony for piano and voice — the documentary presenter listens to this as he looks at it — and tells the story of "man’s quest for happiness". I can't wait to go to Vienna and see it for myself. Until then, I will thinking about this panel featuring a giant ape aka the god Typhoeus, one of the deadliest creatures in all of Greek mythology:
  • One for the people who, like me, have spent many patient hours explaining why bad web design choices are bad — shouldiuseacarousel.com. This part especially resonated: "Carousels are effective at being able to tell people in Marketing/Senior Management that their latest idea is on the Home Page."
  • The quest for ever-greater productivity is, by definition, never-ending. Only when we realise this can we escape the trap of the "productivity journey", as this writer discovers. "How many of these things we produce is not productivity. How you spend your life is."
  • Do you have a lot of time to fill with keyboard taps? If so, I recommend this browser-based Pacman game.
  • I do look at the Goodreads reviews of my books; maybe I shouldn't, but I do. They demand to be read. I find them absolutely mind-boggling and the entire platform inexplicable. I am not the only one.

This is the first of what might well become a series of link-sharing newsletters; I have been missing curating this kind of digital ephemera as I used to do when No Complaints first began back in 2014. Any (polite, kind) feedback or submissions for future inclusion are welcome via reply to this email.

I intend to send out a few different types of post on this newsletter as it becomes more active: personal essays, reading updates and book reviews, reflections on my own writing, and links round-ups like this one. If you would like to receive some but not all of these, you can adjust those settings in your account menu. I don't publish these posts on my website; this is a newsletter-only publication, so you will need to be subscribed to receive it.

I'm writing this in my free time, but if you would like to support my work, you have a few options. Forward this newsletter to a friend and encourage them to sign up. Subscribe to my podcast, Shedunnit, in your app of choice, or if you are already a listener, become a member of the Shedunnit Book Club. Buy my books — The Way to the Sea and A Body Made of Glass — or borrow them from your local library. Purchase a subscription for yourself or a friend to The Browser. And if you buy a book from a link to Blackwells in this newsletter (marked with a *) I will receive a small commission (the price stays the same for you). Thank you for reading.

Until next time,

Caroline

Filed under: Thursday Thirteen, Blog
4 min read Permalink

The Post-Book Blues

Back at the bottom of the mountain again.

For a long time, I would always get sick on the first day of a holiday. Having remained functional through the final weeks of a long school term or period at work, it was only when my time was at last my own that my body would make its problems known. This effect was especially pronounced towards the end of senior school when every exam carried that "the results could affect the rest of your life" heft. The first few days of every break were spent in bed, clutching my stomach and/or mopping up snot. It was just the way I was made, I thought.

Funnily enough, this is actually how I came to be diagnosed with cancer when I was 17 (readers of A Body Made of Glass will know more about that), because I finished a very long and arduous school term, took to my bed with my customary malaise once the Christmas holidays began, and then didn't get better on my usual timetable. Three weeks later, I was still laid low, which is why my mother took me to a doctor who ultimately referred me to an X-ray clinic and then a haemato-oncologist, who then saw me through the next five years of treatment and recovery.

I don't experience this pattern of illness anymore. I am lucky that my life is no longer structured so rigidly into terms and holidays or periods of hellish office labour interspersed with much-needed moments of paid time off. It doesn't feel anymore like I am running on a treadmill that I cannot adjust until it stops at an appointed date far in the future when I will be able to safely collapse.

But I do still experience a sort of long-range time blindness when it comes to big life events. I become so focused on a highly anticipated moment in the future — the day of the house move, the start of a new job, the arrival of a guest — that I cannot visualise what might happen once that event has occurred. There is only a void, a cliff edge off which I will have fallen. Will I even still exist? Will anything? My brain cannot conceive of it.

This is how my mind approached the publication date of both my books: 6th June 2019 and then 11th April 2024. Years of work went into preparing for each of these days. Work on a book doesn't finish when you finish writing it. That's just when you switch into a different mode, preparing how to frame it for marketing and review. You toil for months on trying to generate as much interest as possible, all focused on that one day of release. And then, if you are part of the 90+ per cent of authors who do not make their full-time living from writing books, you are supposed to get up the next day and carry on with your life unchanged, almost as if all that effort and preparation had meant nothing.

Both times, this has given me something akin to emotional whiplash. It was less severe in 2019, I think, because the comedown from publication day was more gradual. I had lots of literary festival events booked for the summer that I travelled for, so there was more of a transition period from "book life" into real life. This time, it has happened more dramatically. I spent a few weeks doing nothing but book work, with sometimes five or six interviews and online events in a day. And then it dropped to none at all. I have a couple more in-person gigs in the calendar, one in July and one in August, but that's it. The contrast is jarring, to say the least.

The last few weeks have been blue. It's difficult for me to articulate why, when I have been so fortunate. In terms of real-world benchmarks, the book has surpassed all my expectations. It was serialised on BBC Radio 4 and reviewed in the New York Times! I can't name a single piece of publicity that I would have wished for but didn't get. That is not something I will likely ever be able to say again. I have been incredibly lucky. I feel guilty about feeling anything less than ecstatic.

Why do I feel so down? Why am I struggling to concentrate on anything and feel might cry every time I catch a glimpse of my book either online or in person? Why, having mostly avoided the comparison trap for months, am I now upset by literary festival listings and social media posts? I have been wrestling with this question and still don't know the answer.

A clue arrived, though, in this newsletter:

"Post-publication depression is a real thing. Writing a book requires a gut-gouging quantity of emotional vulnerability, isolation, and uncertainty. Most people are exhausted by the time they cross the finish line. Most people are not even positive when they can stop running."

It's not just me, then. It's the system. The writer, Anna Sproul-Latimer of the Neon Literary agency, goes on to describe the post-publication period as being characterised by "the dissolution of a survival fantasy". Authors get through the tough years of writing alone by thinking that all the exciting communal fun they will have once their book is on sale will make the misery worthwhile, only to get to that magical moment and find that it falls short.

Perhaps a beloved bookshop isn't stocking any copies, maybe the reviews aren't what you hoped, or there aren't as many readers or events or interviews as in your dreams. Then comes the disappointment, amplified by the fact that it represents the dashing of long-held hopes. There is no quick fix, either. The only way to "do better next time" is to climb the mountain from the bottom again and spend another several years writing alone.

For myself, I think a lot of this feeling comes from being unsure about what comes next. Should I even write another book, if I'm going to feel like this once it comes out? Part of my brain has been thinking about how I should be "working on my book" every day for the past eight years. I am curious to know what it would be like to be released from that mental load, but I also have ideas I would like to work on and ultimately share with others. Which is it to be?

When I find out, you'll be the first to know.


Thank you for reading. Any (kind) feedback or requests for future subjects are welcome via reply to this email.

This was a personal essay, but there will be other types of posts coming on this list. If you would like to adjust what you receive from me, you can do that in your account menu.

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog
7 min read Permalink

Caroline's Day Off

In which I take the radical step of "not working all the time".

I became a freelance writer in July 2017. I think I can count on one hand the number of days since then on which I have done no work whatsoever. The wonderful flexibility of having a job where nobody holds you to particular hours or expects you to be in a certain location has a less wonderful side. Nobody from payroll polices how much I work or locks me out of the office when it has to close. There are no paid sick days or holiday days, either. I have filed pieces from hospital waiting rooms and uploaded podcasts on Christmas Day. If you are an anxious person with much of your self-worth tied up in your career (hi!), it can be hard to see any reason ever to stop.

Until recently, when I started noticing that although I was "working" as much as ever, all those hours spent sat in front of the computer weren't producing the same level of output as before. Nothing like. Whole chunks of time were spent staring into space and, when I tried to return to the task at hand my mind would perceptibly flinch away from it, bouncing me into a different browser tab to look at something easy and numbing, like Instagram or a news website. It was frustrating: I had just come through several busy months of cramming extra work into every available minute as my book came out; why was it so hard now to simply write an email?

Lots of reasons come to mind — tiredness, burnout, stress, a general feeling of being at a crossroads both professionally and personally. All of these problems felt too large and amorphous to even begin tackling, but I did have one more manageable idea that I could try. I could have a day off. I really could not work for a whole day. The world might not end.

I'm sure this seems incredibly obvious, even silly, to anyone with a healthy relationship to their work. Of course I can have a day off! I used to have a staff job at a magazine where I got 25 paid days off a year, not including public holidays, and I used to take them all! But that was a different person to the one I am today, and now there is no contract with an employer enforcing my right not to work. I am the boss of me and I am not inclined to grant myself such perks.

But I forced myself to do it. In a rare moment of self-knowledge, I realised that this could not be something spontaneous. I needed to make plans, to put in place guardrails so I could not slip easily back into old habits. First, I made a list of everything I would like to do on a day off, which read like this:

  • take a long walk with my dog without needing to be back at a certain time for a meeting
  • watch television, just because I want to and not because I have to review the show
  • go out for a meal by myself
  • explore a place I'm curious about with no agenda or timetable
  • do an activity with some friends

I felt that this was simultaneously a very basic set of requirements and also quite an ambitious list for a single day off. I mulled it over for a few days. The next thing that happened was that the YouTube algorithm relentlessly targeted me with promotional videos for the new series of Bridgerton. I have read all of those books and I have watched the previous seasons, so I suppose that makes sense. From this publicity, I learned that for the first time the show was going to be released in two batches of four episodes a month apart (no doubt to keep people subscribed to Netflix for two months instead of one). On 16th May, the first four would drop.

For no good reason other than I find that show a fluffy, unchallenging diversion, I picked that as the date for my day off. I had no work obligations scheduled that would need to move. It also happened to be a day when my chamber choir was due to rehearse in the evening, and the weather forecast was decent. It all seemed to line up: I would watch some new Bridgerton, take my dog for a nice walk, go into Liverpool mid afternoon, wander around a bit, go out to eat, and then enjoy singing with my friends. A good plan.

I arranged with my colleagues at The Browser to swap duties that day and started looking forward to it. I even assigned blocks on my calendar to my different day off activities to make sure that I would have a timetable to follow and wouldn't waste the day doing household chores or scrolling on my phone. Again, absurd that this is necessary, but I knew how easily I could guilt myself into not doing what I wanted, and then I would berate myself for the failure. If there was already a schedule to follow and I didn't need to make any decisions, it seemed more likely that I would take the path of least resistance and stick to the plan.

My resolve was tested once in between making the arrangements and the day itself, when a podcast interviewee needed to reschedule and had a strong preference for this day. I even drafted a response to their email agreeing to it, appeasing my inner objections with the idea that "it'll only be 90 minutes out of your day off". But it wouldn't be, would it? I would have to prepare, set up the equipment, transfer the files afterwards, decompress from being "on" for a while before I could do anything else. I deleted the draft reply and proposed new dates a few weeks ahead, one of which worked. Nobody minded. The day off was saved.

The 16th May arrived. I followed my timetable and had a lovely time! I did feel a little foolish adhering to a detailed schedule that had things like "watch Bridgerton episode two" on it, it is true. I'm still very new to prioritising my mental wellbeing over my incessant compulsion to work all the time, I think, and like a small child I need structure to thrive.

After a pleasant morning involving some television and some dog walking, I took the train into Liverpool. I headed for a riverside area called the Baltic Triangle where, pre-pandemic, I had a little studio space. It has a post-industrial, slightly dilapidated feeling. As the name suggests, this is where timber and other imported goods from Scandinavia were warehoused in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and that industry then declined and relocated. I haven't really been there much since 2020, and the gentrification/redevelopment process has come on apace. There are some really nice new innovations, like this community garden with a view of the Anglican cathedral:

I wandered around there for a while, then went to a coffee shop I used to frequent when I used to come here to work. It has a pleasingly large dairy-free menu, which I used to full advantage:

Inevitably, there is something very "Shoreditch in 2007" to the aesthetic choices here, all plywood and string lights, but I'm old enough these days that this reads as nostalgic rather than annoying.

Next I went to take in some Baltic heritage, in the form of the Gustav Adolf Church, originally built in the late nineteenth century to serve the Scandinavian emigrants living in the area and still a cultural centre for the Nordic community.

I love the extremely pointy lead roof! At this point, I started really enjoying myself as a tourist in my own city as you can only do when you truly let yourself see a familiar place with new eyes. So, I went to the Chinese supermarket and bought the good snacks.

Liverpool's Chinatown is one of the oldest and best-established in Europe and it shares a boundary with the Baltic Triangle. Happily munching, I wandered around some more and took in the excellent graffiti palimpsest at the skatepark:

I don't even follow football and this mural made me tear up a bit. I guess that's what seven years of living here will do to you.

In between the shiny new buildings and warehouse conversions, there are still a few older businesses clinging on.

Very curious about this one:

Last thing before my choir rehearsal, I took myself for an early dinner at a street food market in an old brewery (I know, so hipster). It was a very good falafel wrap, though.

I ended the day singing medieval madrigals with my friends in an old church. And even though I had done nothing other than enjoy myself all day, I fell asleep as soon as my head hit the pillow. It was a very good day off. Perhaps I'll have another one some time. I might even make a habit of it.

Until next time,

Caroline


Thank you for reading this, the first instalment of my newly-relaunched newsletter! Any (kind) feedback or requests are welcome via reply to this email. Henceforth, I'm planning on doing broadly three kinds of posts, on no particular schedule: personal essays/updates like this one, lists of good links, and diary entries about my new book project. If you would like to manage which of these you receive, you can do that in your account menu here.

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog
6 min read Permalink

what I know about getting books published

This is a post from my newsletter. Sign up to get it in your inbox here.

I got to feel the most like an author I ever feel this week, when I went to London for a meeting with my UK publishers and agents to begin the publicity process for A Body Made of Glass. It comes out in just over six months’ time, which sounds like a long time away but is also not very long at all — time works differently in the book world, I have learned. The proof copies had coincidentally arrived at the office the day before, so I was able to snag one for myself to take home. This is the first time the book has physical form, albeit in this workaday, non-final design for advance readers like booksellers and reviewers. It’s both exciting and a bit nerve-wracking to realise that the book isn’t just mine any more: strangers can hold it and read it now, too.

This is my second book with the same publisher, so a lot of what was unknown to me back in 2019 is now somewhat familiar. I know the basics of how we go about trying to convince people to take a chance on what I’ve written, but there are always new things to try and to learn from. As someone who has been reading and enjoying books for her whole life, the behind-the-scenes process of how they get from ideas inside people’s heads on to my shelves fascinates me. When I talk shop with other writers I always like to compare and contrast my experiences with theirs. This is also helpful for me because there are few definitive or transparent sources out there on the publishing industry, either for those seeking to enter it or those already afloat on its choppy waters in some way. When I hear from readers who are also writers, either via email or on Instagram, this is the most common theme of our correspondence: how are you supposed to find out these things that everyone already seems to know?

I’m very far from being an expert in all this. This is just my second non-fiction book for adults with a UK/US publisher, so if you’re publishing a different kind of work elsewhere in the world, my experiences might not apply to you. But people were very generous in helping me when I was trying to work this stuff out and I’d like to put that same energy out into the world in case it helps somebody else. I’d also recommend the Agents and BooksCounter Craft and Craft Talk newsletters for good insights. What follows is my take on the most common questions I receive about writing a book and getting it published.

How do I get started?

This may sound extremely obvious, but you have to write something. Pitching books is not like pitching articles, where you send a brief summary and, if they like it, take it from there. For books, you need to do some really time-intensive writing first. To my mind, this is the hardest part of all, having to take myself and my ideas seriously enough to show up and write it day after day even though nobody asked me to and nobody is paying me yet. If you are writing the kind of non-fiction book I do (narrative/creative non-fiction), you need to write a proposal. This usually consists of an overview of the book, an outline of your structure and chapters, some information about what the market for the book will be (what successful books have similarities to yours?) and a sample chapter. This last bit is the hardest part, but to get publishers to part with cash you need to show them how brilliant your book will be. All told, my proposals tend to be about 20,000 words. It’s a lot. If you’re writing fiction, you typically have to write the whole thing, or at least a very substantial part of it, before anyone will consider it for publication.

Do you have to have an agent?

No, but it helps. Most major publishers rarely work with unagented writers. In exchange for their percentage of any money you make (15 per cent is normal), you get access to your agent’s industry expertise and contacts, as well as having someone in every meeting who is there solely to represent you. Most agents have an online presence where they advertise if/when they are looking for new writers, what kind of writing they are seeking to represent, and how you go about submitting to them. My agent is currently open for submissions, for instance. In general, when agents have guidelines about what you should submit for consideration, follow them to the letter. Most people won’t; you automatically get a leg up just by showing that you can read and abide by instructions. Make it easy for them to pick you. My best tip for finding an agent is to look at the acknowledgements of books you love that are similar to yours and build a list of possible names to research further that way. If they represent writers you aspire to emulate, there’s a decent chance what you’re doing will suit.

Why won’t they publish my book?

Many, many reasons, not all of them fair or rational. If you’ve queried and submitted and obeyed all the rules and it still isn’t working for you, I’m sorry. Publishing is a capricious and changeable industry, built on something that is fundamentally unknowable at scale: precisely what people want to read at any given moment. To illustrate what I mean, here’s something that happened when my first book was sent out to possible editors. My agent sent it to 14 of them; four responded positively and ten said no thank you. Of that ten, exactly half rejected it because they felt the idea had been too much done before and the other half said no because they felt there wasn’t sufficient market for the topic. It’s all subjective: to some, my idea was too niche, to others it was over-saturated. I tried to learn from that not to take anything anyone says as the final definitive word on anything, and I would advise you do the same.

How do you pay bills while you write a book?

For the vast majority of writers (including me!), you pay bills while you write a book by doing other work at the same time. In 2022, the median earnings for authors in the UK was £7,000 a year, down 60 per cent in real terms since 2006. For reference, an annual living wage is estimated at just under £20,000. Other than a few celebrities and very successful authors at the very top, almost nobody is making a full-time living just from writing books. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise, or make you feel ashamed about this.

Even when you do get paid what looks, on paper, to be a decent amount for your book, the payment structure and fees can catch you out. Commonly, a publisher will “advance” you a sum against the future sales of your book to cover costs while you write it. They then recoup this out of your sales, so you don’t earn any royalties until your book has “earned out” the amount of its advance. Lots of books never earn out, so the advance is the only money you ever receive. Out of this initial advance payment, you have to take off tax and your agent’s percentage. Also, you will probably be paid the advance in thirds or quarters — one instalment upon signing the contract, one when you deliver the book manuscript, one when the hardback comes out, and one when the paperback is published. There might be three or even four years between the first payment and the last. And publishers, like many big companies, can be slow to pay. I’m sure you can see how quickly even a relatively generous sum starts to feel like something you can’t really rely on as “income”.

So, what can you do? I’m assuming you’re not personally wealthy or the spouse of a rich person, by the way, although that is how some people square this circle. For the rest of us, maybe you have a full-time job and you write books in your spare time. Perhaps writing books is one thing in a portfolio of freelance work that sustains you. If you’re lucky enough to get paid sabbatical time from doing something else, that can be a good time to do the bulk of the work on a book without ending up out of pocket. Some people prefer their day job to be something totally unrelated to writing so that part of their brain is always fresh for their own projects. Others (like me) use the same skills involved in writing books to do related, more lucrative, jobs, like freelance journalism (ha!), newsletter writing, podcasting and so on. Each to their own. There are no wrong ways to go about this.

How many heinous a-holes have you encountered?

I loved the wording of this particular question too much to do a polite paraphrase of it. Honestly, only one truly, truly bad person has crossed my path in my journey through publishing so far, which I feel is quite a good average compared to the general population. I have interacted with a few less-than-sensitive people (and some of those do get called out in my new book, actually!) but they had their redeeming qualities too. In general, the people I work with in publishing are very nice and very hardworking. Maybe I’m just lucky, but I don’t think too many genuine villains spend their time crafting books in exchange for a middling-at-best salary.

I’ll stop now before this email gets so long that it cuts off in your inboxes, but if there are other questions you have or more details you’d like on any of this, just hit reply and let me know.

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog
6 min read Permalink

this is me trying

There is a story about Oscar Wilde that I was told in my first week as an undergraduate that I am thinking about a lot at the moment. While he was a student at Oxford, Wilde became well known for the impossibility of his brilliance. All he seemed to do was socialise, spew forth witticisms and lounge around in beautiful outfits, yet he somehow also managed to deliver essays and poems of such astuteness and flair that after four years of such aesthetic idleness he graduated with a double first and won the Newdigate Prize for poetry.

How did he do it? By working tremendously hard in secret, so the tale went. When he finally said goodbye to his friends after a long night of elegant carousing, he did not head for bed as they thought. Instead, he studied and wrote furiously, often going without sleep so that in the morning he could once more give the appearance of effortless, even lazy, genius. And it worked: by the time he left university, Wilde was known internationally for his enormous intellect and supposedly extempore quips. A glittering career as a writer and public intellectual beckoned.

I don’t know if this story is true. I’ve never wanted to research it properly: it is too perfect to spoil with facts. It seems consistent with what I know of Wilde’s career post-university and his place at the vanguard of the burgeoning aesthetic movement, and that is good enough for me. When I heard it at the age of 18, it confirmed for me something that my insecurities had long suggested — that the worst thing in the world is to be caught in the act of trying.

Earnest and anxious from a very early age, I was by this time fairly familiar with being called a “try-hard”. I had also registered that these accusations only accompanied failure, not success. I was a try-hard on the sports field, where no matter how dogged my efforts my lack of talent always resulted in utter humiliation, but never in the classroom, where a freakishly sponge-like memory (now long gone) saw me regurgitating information I did not understand in exchange for good marks. Being told the Wilde story at such an impressionable moment merely confirmed what I thought I already knew: being truly good at something meant never letting anyone see the effort or the failures it had taken to attain success.

When I put the proposal for my first book out for sale, I found that the publishing industry worked on much the same basis. The whole process was very opaque, with little information about how it all worked accessible unless you had a friend or mentor further along who was willing to give you the benefit of their experiences. Seen from the outside, there were long silences punctuated only by dazzling announcements: a major deal, a place on a bestseller list, a film adaptation. The rest — the trying and the failing and the trying again — was kept out of sight, as if it never happened at all.

It was very rare, I found back in 2017, to encounter someone openly discussing that they had tried and failed to write or sell a book. Even once I had found a publisher for my idea and embarked on writing it, the Wildean impulse to make it appear effortless was overwhelming, even though I was a novice laboriously and chaotically doing it all for the first time. To be seen to try is to appear weak, perhaps undeserving. When so many people want to be writers and aren’t given the opportunity, it seems extremely churlish to dwell in public on the less-than-ideal aspects of the occupation. Much better to make the difficulties invisible and then emerge on publication day to bask in the good reviews, accepting any praise that comes with a knowing smile that says “thank you, I did all this without even trying”.

The eye of the storm of all this for me, these days, is social media. At a time when traditional arts coverage is stretched and dominated by the celebrities who keep writing books, for the ordinary author it is vital to have a way of connecting directly with readers. In the past I haven’t put the effort and thought into doing this that it merits. I used to use Twitter for work when I was in political journalism but let my account go dormant as soon as I had moved on professionally; I enjoy posting about my dog and my reading and my cooking on Instagram but I’ve never put in the consistent effort to make it a channel that potential readers might find useful or attractive. I consume TikToks in a lofi secondhand way (might write about this another day) and I don’t make them. Facebook, for me, is entirely about sourcing secondhand furniture.

When my first book came out, I popped up on social media a few days before publication and said “Tada! I wrote book. Please buy it,” and that was about it. The response was, naturally, kind but underwhelming. The rejections from traditional media are far less visible. On a social media platform, my post can sit there forever, visibly ignored. For a long time, the knowledge that this was an important part of my job that I was neglecting chafed against my desire never to be caught in the act of trying. Because what looks more like trying than repeatedly posting publicly about your work, asking people to pay attention to it, and being ignored? Much better to have success miraculously occur and then be able to modestly highlight it, like Oscar Wilde probably would have done if he’d had Instagram in the mid 1870s.

I do think that the architecture of the internet today encourages this hesitance to be seen to be putting in effort. Social media, as we all know but can never remember in those low moments, is just a highlight reel of the best days and the best news. Those who do post with the greatest success do tend to make it look very easy, as if setting up a camera for every shot so as to capture yourself “casually” going about your day and then editing it into a seamless, appealing package with a jaunty soundtrack isn’t a lot of work that once upon a time would have been done by a whole crew of specialists. I’ve mostly tried to cut too-perfect influencers out of my personal media diet, but I do keep those who periodically post their drafts and their outtakes; it is useful for me to be reminded that a polished end product went through a lot of iterations and attempts.

Why am I telling you all of this? Well, because I’m entering a season of life and work in which I want to try, really hard, and I felt the need to set the scene for that. I am aware that writing about trying “too hard” is probably the definition of trying too hard. But: my next book comes out in spring 2024 and it took a lot of effort and soul-searching to bring it into being. I would like as many people as possible to read it. I don’t think I am someone who can be Very Online all the time any more, but I am keen on the idea that even people who aren’t in full-time education can benefit from thinking of their life in semester-length chunks. This coming term and next is going to be a time for me of looking out rather than in, and talking about ideas and work that I’m proud of. This mode doesn’t come naturally to me. I’m going to have to try hard at it.

This newsletter is a big part of that. I found that I couldn’t write to you like this while also writing a book that contained a lot of personal stories and big feelings, but now that’s done, I can be here again. If there are subjects you would like me to cover or questions you want answered, just reply and let me know. This is a space for things that I’m interested in and also what you’re interested in too. Suggestions so far have included: overcoming writer’s block, moving out of London, how to switch career into writing. It won’t be perfect, but then what is?

In the words of the literary giant of our age, Ms Taylor Alison Swift: this is me trying.

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog
7 min read Permalink

rummaging through all the paper

I feel like I have been taking notes on what I read since I was about 14, and that for all of that time I have been doing so very badly.

For me, there has always been two reasons to take a note.

Firstly, to pick one idea out of the many on the page and put it down in my own way is to make a decision about the information I prioritise. The very act of selecting and transcribing the thought I had when I encountered that element of the book helps me to understand and categorise what I’m reading. In theory.

Secondly, the notes should act as a record that I can return to later, once the short term memories of that particular book have faded. Scanning through them, I would like to think, will revivify the experience of encountering that text for the first time and allow easy access to the information I selected for future work.

The studying and note taking I did at school and university all took place on paper. As a teenager, I loved stationary and hauled around a heavy backpack with many folders, notebooks and coloured pens. I recently helped my mother clear out some of the notes I produced during this time from her attic, and was startled to see how incredibly elaborate and comprehensive this stuff was. In many cases I was reproducing the textbook in full, complete with multi-coloured headings and carefully drawn diagrams. Perhaps the act of writing it all out again had some memory function for me (more on this in a moment) but there was no sense of distillation or selection. These weren’t notes so much as copies, the work of a scribe with too much time on her hands. The “aesthetic notes” movement, so ubiquitous today online, feels like it’s still stuck at this point.

I got a laptop when I went to university and wrote my weekly essays on this computer, using my handwritten notes to do so. Wifi wasn’t widespread and although portable the laptop mostly lived on my desk in my student room, plugged into an ethernet cable. Only my ruled A4 pad and my pen travelled with me to libraries and lectures. Thus, for every book I read, there was a sheaf of paper full of page numbers and quotations that I had copied out. I wasn’t doing the colourful headings – I was a serious undergraduate now — but the instinct to transcribe everything was still very strong. I remember being frustrated when trying to write up my assignments late at night, rummaging through all the paper I had used in the library that week and failing to find anything that I could slot into my argument because it was unclear why I had copied out these quotations rather than any others.

Handwriting my notes was a habit further reinforced by my journalism training, where we were taught shorthand and how to lay out a notebook so that it would be admissible as evidence in court. It wasn’t until I began work on my first book that I contemplated switching from noting by hand to using a computer, in an attempt to circumvent the need to flick through so much paper. That book is in part a history of the river Thames, a subject about which a vast amount of information has been published in the last 500 years. My process was one of extreme distillation, trying to sample as much as I could in the time that I had and then discarding what didn’t resonate with me as I built my own narrative.

I used Scrivener, a piece of software often recommended for authors, which has an interface that allows lots of different text documents to sit alongside each other as if in a ring binder and be combined or separated at will. Each book I read had a different entry, and the global search function was helpful — when I reached a point in my manuscript where I wanted a fact about Hilaire Belloc’s walks from Oxford to London as a student in the 1890s, for instance, I could just hit Control + Option + F and see if I had any notes to repurpose. I didn’t write the book in Scrivener, though, which is what that software is in part designed for. I did that in Microsoft Word. I don’t remember why, really.

Although having all of the information that I had amassed searchable like this was a vast improvement on a mass of paper filled with contextless quotations, it still didn’t feel like a useful repository of notes. Often when I did turn up a search result for something I was writing about the information I had recorded wasn’t sufficient or even comprehensible. I would still have to go back to the original source or do more research. It felt like I was doing the same work twice.

Typing notes directly into the computer like this also seemed to sever an important link I hadn’t even realised was there. Handwriting made me slow down enough to think more fully about what I was recording and why. It also seemed to give me some spatial awareness about the book I was reading, to the extent that I could often remember where on the page and how far through a book a particular moment came. When taking notes digitally, I had no such memory. Plus, computers are too full of distraction. It’s too easy to check email or social media instead of taking notes when it all happens in the same place.

When I embarked on my current book project, then, I was determined to find a better way. Unlike the Thames, hypochondria is a topic that has relatively rarely been addressed head on (which is in part why I’m doing it now). There aren’t many books or articles, relatively speaking, with that word in the title. The research process is more intuitive and requires me to hop between disciplines and types of sources, collecting what is relevant from fields as disparate as folklore and neurology. I hope this is what will make the eventual book worth reading, but as an information gathering and storage exercise, it’s complicated. I don’t know what the structure is in advance or where it will take me, so I can’t design an approach ahead of time.

So I did what I probably should have done years ago and did some research into the practice of note taking itself. I found that there is indeed a detectable link between handwriting and the formation of complex memory. I encountered the work of the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, who maintained a prodigious scholarly output in his lifetime and even after his death because of the way he noted each individual idea he had on a separate card in a Zettelkasten or slipbox and used a sequence of numbers to link them. I fell headfirst into this world of “smart note taking” and would recommend two of the books I read to anyone who is also interested in this: How to Take Smart Notes by Sönke Ahrens and Digital Zettelkasten by David Kadavy. I also found a phD student with a helpful YouTube channel that demonstrates these principles, and began to build a new system for myself.

This is what my notes look like now.

This is the visual view from a programme called Obsidian. It’s a skin that sits on top of a folder of markdown documents and allows you to manipulate and link them. Each of the nodes that you see above is a separate note file, and you can see in this timelapse that as I’ve added more and found connections between the ideas that various hubs have developed, showing me where the key texts and concepts are. Following Luhmann’s example, I’m not producing long lists of quotations from each book I read, but rather writing out each idea that I encounter in my own words, adding any necessary references, and then saving that as a note in its entirety, the better for linking together with others. I really love this process — it’s almost like I can feel the synapses firing in my brain – and it’s already helping me structure sections of the book that require me to pull together disparate ideas into a seamless narrative.

As for how I’m reading books now, this is an area where I feel like I’m waiting for the technology to catch up with me. I want the tactile, memory-forming habit of taking notes by hand but the convenient searchability of a digital repository. Something like Apple’s “Scribble” handwriting recognition feature on the iPad would seem to offer this, but so far it’s been too clunky and inaccurate for me. Instead, I have a Supernote A5X, which is an e-ink tablet designed entirely for reading and writing, and I read and annotate all my journal articles and ebooks on that before exporting them and adding them to Obsidian. I really like the simplicity of this device and the fact that it really doesn’t do anything other than that use case I’ve just described. You couldn’t check Twitter on it even if you wanted to.

If I’m working from a physical book, I still like to read with a pencil in my hand. I do write in the margins of books that I own and use sticky notes to mark the pages where I’ve made comments that I’ll want to put into Obsidian later. If it’s a library book or one I don’t want to scribble for some reason, I use transparent sticky notes to write next to the text I’m referencing and then I remove them when I’m done.

One thing that I’ve been very conscious of through all of this is my habit for productive procrastination; of finding “worthwhile” activities that fill up my time so that I never get started on what I’m supposed to be doing. Fortunately I found this new note taking style so addictive that I immediately wanted to try it on real material and made progress that way, but it’s always something I’m alert for. This kind of “digital gardening” could absorb a lot of time without much benefit if you’re not careful. The lack of rigidity in this system is a useful guard against this tendency too, because the structure emerges as you work rather than being something you have to create and then tweak as circumstances change. If something isn’t working in my Obsidian, I just do it differently without redoing everything that has gone before.

Given that, I am always refining and improving this process — it’s not static — and I would love to hear from you about how you read books and take notes.

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog
4 min read Permalink

I feel a warm little glow of satisfaction

I read that piece in the Observer last weekend about how fear of a miserable, long, dark winter is mostly in the mind — I’m paraphrasing, but that was roughly it — so of course I have started watching Borgen again from the beginning.

I saw this Danish political drama when it first started airing on the BBC in 2012, so I’m not really in it for the coalition-forming drama this time. Rather, I’m looking for clues on how to be good at being inside when it’s cold and dark all the time.

This scene from the first episode struck me as an atmosphere I’d like to have. Philip Christensen, husband of politician Birgitte Nyborg, has been at home on his own with the kids while she’s out campaigning. When she comes home, we see him from her perspective as she comes through the front door. He’s working on the sofa, shoes off, books next to him, a beer half drunk on the table in front of him. The curtains behind him are open, showing the darkness outside, because he’s not bothered about it and his house is well insulated. He looks cosy, busy, and just a little bit pissed off that she’s now going to interrupt him with a long story about how all the other politicians are bad apart from her.

In the UK, Borgen was part of the inspiration for a larger trend towards more Nordic cool in interiors, publishing and fashion. People went wild for the lampshades and for a while you couldn’t turn round in a bookshop without knocking over a “how to hygge” book. The mania has abated somewhat, but if Instagram is anything to go by, people are still very into mustard L-shaped couches.

Now, I should emphasise, this is very much not my personal aesthetic. That low-backed sofa Philip is sitting on looks extremely uncomfortable and I bet the hairy rug is a devil to clean. Plus, I like my light fittings to look like something other than flying saucers. My house is from the 1890s and I’m much more interested in making it look like a National Trust property on a budget.

But I do like how happily Philip is coexisting with the darkness outside, leaving his curtains open and keeping the light minimal. The day after we watched this episode, I looked around the tottering piles of stuff in our living room and had a think about how I could make the space feel less frustrating, given that all the signs are I’m not going to be leaving it any time soon.

I decided on two courses of action that in my head I called “clearing sightlines” and “minor mendings”. I can’t Marie Kondo away all of the stuff, because a) although it does not spark joy a lot of it is paperwork and course materials my husband needs for work that would normally be at his office and b) it feels redundant, even unfair to dump donatable things on charity shops nobody is shopping in at the moment. But I can organise it in such away that it isn’t always in my eye line, and make the vista as you enter a room a pleasant one.

“Minor mendings” is a phrase that came unbidden into my head, borrowed from the 2014 conclusion to Lev Grossman Magicians trilogy. A character discovers that he has no grand, impressive magical gift, but rather a talent for fixing things, for making good after a disaster. Those books are not without their problems, but they would make for a nice wintery reading session if you haven’t tried them yet.

My own version of this involved standing in the middle of each room with a notebook for a few minutes, thinking about the things that are inconvenient or broken but in such a familiar way now that I don’t notice them. It was very gratifying every time I spotted another one, like doing one of those “spot the difference” puzzles, and soon I had quite a list of handles to glue back on, wobbly hooks to screw in properly, and light bulbs to replace. I’m by no means a competent or well equipped handyman, but even I had enough epoxy and the right screwdriver to make these small adjustments.

It probably took less than an hour to tidy up and to fix everything. Now, every time I reach up and successfully open a kitchen cupboard that used to have a handle that pinged off one in three times that you touched it, I feel a warm little glow of satisfaction. The same happens when I come through the front door and see a nice clear table in front of me, or reach out to put a mug down easily and safely while drinking tea in an armchair. It might sound simple, but the lethargy towards these small household chores I felt after six months of being in the house all the time was immense.

I’m not sure that I will ever obtain the positive attitude towards the winter confinement that a resident of Copenhagen or Tromsø might have, but I have at least made my space a little more inviting for the coming months. If you’re also in the northern hemisphere, I recommend doing the same now, before the clocks go back and the pre-4pm darkness envelopes us.

Twelve things I’m reading, watching and listening to:

If you enjoy the podcasts I recommend in this newsletter, consider taking out a subscription to The Listener, the daily podcast recommendation newsletter I write. I promise, it’s really good, and it’s a great way to show your support of my work.

Apart from that, there are a few other places on the internet where you can find me: I write weekly podcast industry reports for Hot Pod, I make a fortnightly podcast called Shedunnit and I’m sometimes on Twitter and Instagram. My book is now out in paperback, find the links to purchase a copy here.

Until next time,

Caroline

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog
3 min read Permalink

when will we cry in public again?

I haven’t been on a train since early March, so naturally I’ve been daydreaming about public transport a lot recently.

I’m lucky not to need to use it at the moment, of course, and I’m well aware that for every time I’ve spent a journey staring out of the window at a gorgeous view, there’s one where I sat in some vomit. Similarly, I’ve had some deeply unpleasant interactions with strangers while travelling — the roving packs of men going to stag parties on the Friday night train to Liverpool, for instance —  but it’s the unexpectedly amiable ones that have come to mind again now.

A case in point: it was the morning after the night before I had told someone I liked them, really liked them. Absurdly, I don’t actually remember what it was that they said in response, the precise words they used, but it was definitely along the lines of “thanks, but no thanks”. I had been keying myself up to make this declaration for months. Every aspect of how I should do it, every possible permutation, had already been considered and taken into account by my febrile, overactive brain. Except this one: how do I keep going afterwards if it doesn’t go well?

That’s how I ended up on the Tube, taking my usual train to work but feeling as if the connection between my body and my mind had come unstuck. I was sitting in my seat but also floating somewhere around in the curved roof of the carriage, watching myself fall apart without a plan. It was still on the early side for a morning commute, but there were enough people milling about in the stations to make this dislocation even more acutely unpleasant.

My journey was only a short one, two stations north on one line and then four east on another one, but I couldn’t make it. Just before the doors closed at Embankment I dived out and collapsed on one of the recessed benches in the wall in tears. Nobody could really see me, because there were people bustling in both directions along the narrow platform between me and the trains, and anyway one of the glorious and awful things about having a public breakdown in central London is that everyone ignores you.

When will we cry in public again? It’s an unimaginable activity now, in the time of face masks and the constant awareness of bodily fluids and air circulation. Part of what made it cathartic was that intensity of being alone in a crowd, the press of uncaring bodies all around emphasising the absolute solitude of the emotion. It was an especially effective release on trains or in stations — places that contain their own sense of momentum and can impart some of that to someone who pauses there to weep.

I thought I was invisible, tucked into the wall like that. But someone had seen me. A woman dressed in that irreproachable City armour of tailored grey sheath dress, matching jacket and uncomfortable black court shoes suddenly loomed into my little nook. She was holding a packet of tissues out to me. I took them. I probably did an ugly snort where I meant to say “thank you” in response. She didn’t linger, just melting straight back into the crowd. Of course, that just made me cry harder, but at least now I had a way of blowing my nose.

The kindness of strangers. I miss it.

Twelve things I’m reading, watching and listening to:

If you enjoy the podcasts I recommend in this newsletter, consider taking out a subscription to The Listener, the daily podcast recommendation newsletter I write. I promise, it’s really good, and it’s a great way to show your support of my work.

Apart from that, there are a few other places on the internet where you can find me: I write weekly podcast industry reports for Hot Pod, I make a fortnightly podcast called Shedunnit and I’m sometimes on Twitter and Instagram. My book is now out in paperback, find the links to purchase a copy here.

Until next time,

Caroline

Filed under: Personal Essays, Blog